Quados4 23cm dimensions

On special request here the dimensions i used for my quados4 antenna. For further information please see the pages of YU1AW.
It has to be mentioned that the dimensions appear to be a bit too long which can be seen from the measurement below.
This is although the element was manufactured of 2mm diameter wire.

dimensions of my quados4 antenna for 23cm

dimensions of my quados4 antenna for 23cm

23cm Quados4 antenna

Some time ago YU1AW published some documentation about his experiments and simulations with stacked quad elements for 13cm. He optimized the stacked quad design by changing the distances of the quad elements by using parallel wires in between. He showed that these antennas show some improvements against traditionally stacked bi-quad elements were the distance is too low. He published data for 4 quad element antennas (Quados4), such with 6 quad elements and with 8 elements.
DF9IC published some results with the 8 quad element version recalculated for 23cm. This year DH1FM built two of these Quados 8 antennas for 23cm and used it successfully in contest operation.
To get a feeling of this antenna type i built the Quados4 antenna for 23cm. A big problem for me was to get it somehow mechanically stable. The accuracy of the quarter lambda transformer and the big distance between the wires at the feedpoint showed some difficulties as well. In the end the antenna seems to work and brings close to 6dB better results than my biquad antenna. But in fact it seems that the distance between the reflector and the antenna element is still too large because it improves if the end elements are bent towards the reflector.
Find some pictures below.

Quados4 input matching measurement

Quados4 input matching measurement


Quados4 antenna test construction

Quados4 antenna test construction

For the future i will try to build a 2x Quados4, means two of the elements above side by side.

CAT control of FT-817

Last days i did some experiments controlling the FT817 via CAT. I implemented some basic commands in the math scripting environment Octave (which is a Matlab compatible software). The communication with the serial CAT interface is not possible directly because Octave does not support serial communication. Therefore i used the VSPE (virtual serial port emulator) to connect the serial port to a TCP port which can be addressed out of Octave.

I wrote a script that can tune over a frequency range and reports the signalled S-meter output. In the end a diagramm of the S-meter output versus frequency is drawn. If you have a narrow filter (e.g. 300Hz CW) than you may use this to get somewhat like a “spectrumscope”. Compare the two pictures below which show a D-Star signal in 70cm band recorded with the FT817 and with  a R&S FSP spectrum analyser. It is clear that there is a low dynamic range and no information what the S-meter readings correspond to in terms of dB but it comes more or less for free.

Short guide: switch transceiver to desired modulation mode and filter bandwith, edit the frequencies and stepsize in the main scan script, start the VSPE software with correct settings, edit the ft817_connect.m script accordingly, start the scan script.

D-star spectrum measured with R&S FSP

D-star signal observed with FT817, 300Hz filter, CW mode

Find some scripts here: octave_ft817_cat_scripts

VHF Yagi measurements

For our club events we had to reconstruct some old DK7ZB design yagies because too many of the 6mm diameter elements got broken over the years. We decided to modify the design for 8mm elements to get some more material for the screwholes.

All measurements were done with the VNWA2 with calibration point at the end of a 20m Ecoflex10 cable (directly at dipole connector).

The measurement of the old construction in a high of about 4.5m looked like that:

8el_28Ohm_DK7ZB_6mm

8el_28Ohm_DK7ZB_6mm Elements

It can be clearly seen that there is something wrong. Maybe the reason is that some of the elements are going to break and some of them have been already repaired. I do not have a comparison to a version with new elements unfortunately.

After modification to 8mm Elements and optimization of all element lengths with YO with keeping the element locations the picture looks like that:

8el_28Ohm_DK7ZB_8mm

8el_28Ohm_DK7ZB_8mm Elements

It can be seen that the best matching of the antenna is slightly too low which is not optimum with some ice on the elements during the march contest. But in general the matching looks like it should now.

For comparison i measured my old 11ele Tonna Yagi as well. The picture surprised me.

Tonna_2m_11el

Tonna_2m_11el

The middle of the matching band is around 145MHz which should also do with some minor ice at the elements. The matching itself looks really good. Of course this does not tell anything about how well the antenna works ;)